Test Your Website’s Accessibility Risk
Most accessibility tools tell you what’s broken. This one tells you what it’s likely to cost you.
Enter your URL and we’ll score your site across three dimensions — technical WCAG severity, legal exposure, and real-world impact on people using assistive technology — so you can see exactly where your risk concentrates and how urgently it needs attention. You’ll get a composite risk score and a prioritized breakdown in seconds. Where the gaps are serious, FIREANT STUDIO can turn the findings into a remediation plan.
Test Your Site for Accessibility Risks
Accessibility Risk Report for:
Three-Axis Risk Model
Composite Risk Score
69.8
/ 100
High Risk
Composite WCAG
Severity Violation Score
68.5
Critical Emphasis
Aggregated impact based on technical WCAG 2.1 failure thresholds.
Legal Exposure Score
72.0
High Liability
Evaluation of legal risk based on common litigation patterns and ADA standards.
Functional Impact Score
69.0
User Barrier
Real-world usability assessment for assistive technology users.
Summary Overview
38 critical-path violations make core flows unusable for assistive-technology users. Forms, navigation, and primary content cannot be completed without sighted assistance.
Critical Exposure — Act this week
Three findings put you in action-litigation territory. A 12-critical / 38-serious profile typically precedes a demand letter within 90 days. We can stand up a remediation plan in 5 business days.
Violation Detail Summary
Violations Found
39
Total Estimated
1,248
Scan Status
Complete
Critical
01
Serious
17
Moderate
20
Minor
01
Severity Point Breakdown
Perceivability Barriers
42 Points
Operability Restrictions
38 Points
Understandability Flaws
12 Points
Robustness & Technical Integrity
28 Points
Top issues by severity
-
Text contrast fails across most interactive elements
Fifteen instances of insufficient color contrast make text difficult or impossible to read for users with low vision or color perception differences. This affects inputs, labels, and key content throughout the page.
-
Text contrast fails across most interactive elements
Fifteen instances of insufficient color contrast make text difficult or impossible to read for users with low vision or color perception differences. This affects inputs, labels, and key content throughout the page.
-
Page structure prevents assistive technology navigation
The absence of a main landmark combined with 16 content regions outside landmarks means screen reader users cannot efficiently navigate to or between sections of the page.
Legal Exposure Weighting
Inputs, labels, results unreadable
Hierarchy confusion for screen readers
Results output inaccessible
Cannot navigate to tool by landmark
Contextual links invisible to colorblind users
Keyboard navigation dead-end
No orientation landmark on entry
Screen reader landmark navigation broken
User Impact Profile
Estimated functional failure rates based on diagnostic testing against primary user groups.
82%
Blind / AT Users
Major barriers in data tables and image descriptions prevent core transaction completion.
45%
Low Vision
Contrast ratios in secondary UI elements fail WCAG AA minimum standards (4.5:1).
68%
Keyboard-Only
Critical dropdowns lack tab and escape focus indicators prevent modal closure and menu navigation.
30%
Cognitive
Time-limited session lack user control, causing critical data loss in complex forms.